I agree that there isn't anything revolutionary or evolutionary about Titanfall. But most casual gamers don't care about that.
What they do care about is how a game executes what it does and that it does it extremely well.
PS2 may have introduced some evolutionary aspects into FPS gaming (e.g. hundreds of players fighting in one battle) but it doesn't do it very well (e.g. optimization).
As SOE has made PS2 more infantry-centric day by day with each GU release, the natural inclination for many gamers is to compare PS2 to other infantry-centric games (e.g. BF3, COD, BF3, Titanfall, etc.).
The simple fact is other games handle infantry-side type combat much better than PS2 does. E.g. the knifing animation in PS2 is absolutely atrocious.
Originally Posted by Dreamcast
lol, bro I wouldn't doubt it if they added to the game lol.
After all is the COD developer making that game.
Everything I said is true...It looks like COD with mechs.
Is even done by the guy who created COD.
Nothing of the game is special at all....
Jetpacks are in Planetside 2.
Mechs were in Planetside 1, could easily be added in PS2.
Kill mechs by getting on them...Halo 4 did that lol.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aInO0lYzeg
Face it nothing about that game is unique is or revolutinary is just the same old copy/paste game. |