Originally Posted by Bags
Separating F2P and P2P people is stupid. You want the freeloaders to play with the payers so they become jealous of their stylish apparel and hopefully become buyers and so the P2Pers have more people to play with.
|
Ok then. But I didn't say I want EQ2's model....well I still think with some extra rectification/modification with this business model, it could be worth a try. Who knows?
(Don't get me wrong. Cause' I'm more of the Sub guy myself
)
BTW, you guys are
a bit exaggerating the difference between F2P and P2P here.
Let's just look at the EQ2's case as an example. Do players in original servers look like beggars compared to some wealthy F2P server players? Do F2P players look a lot more flamboyant or princely? Or, Do player-owned homes in the original servers look like a ditch compared to F2p player-owned homes in the end? Of course it'll take a lot more time for subscription-gamers to decorate their houses in luxurious ways or equip themselves with some glittering armors, but the difference here won't be that serious.