Originally Posted by Vecha
Who thinks that's acceptable?
The debate is over actually what took place. We don't exactly know what happened...we can guess/hypothesize/etc...but we can't confirm or deny whether he chased the kid down and shot him...there are alot of holes in his story, yes, but I don't think any of us are qualified to jump to any conclusions..yet.
The rhetoric(all around) is getting ridiculous. The politicizing(demanding renewed/changed gun control laws) over this kid's death needs to cool down.
I'll personally hold my judgement.
|
I more or less agree with this here.
The police need to investigate. There needs to be
something more than
nothing. A boy lost his life; surely they can be arsed to at least show due diligence?