Originally Posted by Lumberchuk
On paper yes it has more damage potential, but in practice it could be completely different.
|
Not just more damage potential but more survivability and more tactical flexibility as well. And since the number of individuals working together in either scenario is two, I doubt they're really losing much in the way of situational awareness. The sole quantifiable downside is the cost and while I don't dismiss that entirely I believe that cost is and should be used to keep people from being suicidal with their equipment rather than to pose a significant barrier to entry.
Forgive me if I drift in and out of the conversation, work neverending and so on.
Originally Posted by Azren
What we should try to achieve is to get this cert in a form how it can be implemented. The balance in power can be addressed later.
|
There's a legal concept I've heard of that if you accept any form of compensation for an issue then you forfeit the right to complain. For me this is basically that. I would rather go back and forth and hammer out an agreeable solution than accept a subpar one on the assumption that it will just be fixed later.