Originally Posted by Ragnafrak
1. If a convoy leaves its ANT behind, it's not a very good convoy.
2. If the convoy defending the ANT is destroyed, the attackers deserve to destroy the ANT.
The ANT isn't a combat vehicle. It's a resource transport. It doesn't need to be especially good at killing anything because it's not going to kill anything.
It's a mobile defense objective. It needs to be defended.
|
never said it should be able to kill anything. It should be an unarmed vehicle but it needs some edge over those that will chase it and speed is the only one that will keep it alive.
yes i agree if the convoy gets blown up then they deserve to get the ant too but is that the ant drivers fault ?? no he deserves to have a fighting chance against say a lightening 1v1 and with no weapons he needs to be able to evade its shots and get out of range.
i would suggest that the ANT has a high resource cost somewhere above the harresser to put people off using it as fast transport.