Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Stealing your sigs since 2002.
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
View Poll Results: What do you think about the Gun combat so far? | |||
Perfect...Minimal movement because accuracy should be most important. | 62 | 57.94% | |
Way Too slow...I want to be able to shoot and move very fast..Twitch Gameplay FTW | 9 | 8.41% | |
Slow...Needs more movement but nothing too fast. | 25 | 23.36% | |
Slow...Needs to be exactly like Planetside 1. | 11 | 10.28% | |
Voters: 107. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2012-05-22, 05:14 PM | [Ignore Me] #61 | |||
Major
|
First of all it isn't ADS vs hipfire....That isn't the subject. Why?...Because COD is ADS and you have fast movement..If ttk for COD wasn't low it will be like quake with iron sites (im exaggerating but it will be non stop moving action)...Unlike planetside 2 where you stand and shoot. Planetside 2 could still have Iron Sights and have more movement. As for hip fires being financial suicide LMFAO....no dude just no.....tell that to halo and many other games that do that. |
|||
|
2012-05-22, 05:20 PM | [Ignore Me] #62 | ||
Colonel
|
It is an issue of ADS vs hipfire. Or, let's say this : If CoD allows you to strafe quickly while ADS, then we have to look at that specifically, and I at least don't want that, either, any more than I want hipfire to be fully accurate. When ADS you should be reduced to a slow step in any direction. And if you do want fast movement, it should come with a heavily penalized cone of fire while doing it. Game mechanics should be about more about firing from cover than from a fast strafe - again, in my opinion.
I don't play CoD but if it allows fast movement while ADS then that's an example of how we shouldn't try to mix Quake into this kind of game. Last edited by Stardouser; 2012-05-22 at 05:21 PM. |
||
|
2012-05-22, 05:24 PM | [Ignore Me] #63 | |||
Major
|
|
|||
|
2012-05-22, 05:26 PM | [Ignore Me] #64 | |||
Major
|
I don't see whats the probelm with moving fast with iron sights...and I don't see why u compare it to quake...Obviously if SOE where to put more movement it wouldn't be that fast. The way I see it faster movement with iron sights wouldn't break the game....and hip fire will still be very usefull in close combats since using iron sights when somebody is 4 feet away sucks since the person can just run around you. |
|||
|
2012-05-22, 05:27 PM | [Ignore Me] #65 | ||||
Colonel
|
Hipfire or fast moving ADS would result in no need for that and all 10 would just run at the base strafing on the way lol... Last edited by Stardouser; 2012-05-22 at 05:29 PM. |
||||
|
2012-05-22, 05:45 PM | [Ignore Me] #66 | ||
Captain
|
You should have to aim down sight to properly kill someone from a distance. Running and either hip firing or ADS'ing and firing should be used only to suppress the enemy while you move to cover. This is assuming there is some sort of suppression system (not BF3). Something that makes you think "oh s**t, i should hide, there's bullets flying at my face".
Re-birthing is great but I bet bullets still hurt! Just my two cents. Quick edit: ADS should still put the bullets where the sight is pointing at ALL times. But when moving the gun itself should bounce about making accurate fire difficult. Last edited by DayOne; 2012-05-22 at 05:47 PM. |
||
|
2012-05-22, 05:46 PM | [Ignore Me] #67 | |||
Major
|
|
|||
|
2012-05-22, 05:56 PM | [Ignore Me] #68 | ||
Colonel
|
Honestly, perfect cone of fire aka random deviation is when if moving/not ADS, but cut to zero when stopped and ADS. But honestly? The only reason it's random is because the animation of the gun swaying from your movement doesn't match the bullet pattern. If the animation matched so that you could see, due to your movement, that the gun is swaying, people wouldn't complain about it being random even though it's the same result!
|
||
|
2012-05-22, 06:28 PM | [Ignore Me] #69 | ||
Brigadier General
|
Making a game of pS2's style without including the option of ADS would probably be bad. Maybe not suicide, but why leave out a popular feature that a lot of your fan base will expect?
There is a big difference between ADS being mandatory for reliably hitting someone at 30m and ADS being mandatory for reliably hitting someone at 100m+. They can strike a nice middle ground, where PS1 players who want to hip fire can do so most of the time, and players who obsessively ADS can do so at 20m if they for some reason want to. Both can be well accommodated without disenfranchising anyone in the process. |
||
|
2012-05-22, 06:49 PM | [Ignore Me] #70 | ||||
Captain
|
Even a hip fire CoF increase and a lot more sway on you gun as you ADS would be okay. It causes inaccuracy but not in a BS way. Also cool down on suppression effects should be very short so you would need sustained fire to keep someone under suppression. |
||||
|
2012-05-22, 06:53 PM | [Ignore Me] #71 | |||
Colonel
|
Note that one of the reason(in my opinion) that BF3 uses the suppression that it does instead of sound is because the ambient sound the game uses for immersion purposes drowns out everything else. I also believe that to be the reason for the hated audio spotting, in BF2 you can judge shot direction by sound but ambient so-called "immersive" sound in BF3 drowns it out to where you can't. |
|||
|
2012-05-22, 07:22 PM | [Ignore Me] #72 | ||
If it's just sound it's not going to suppress anyone. It's just good sound effects.
And that's fine by me. If you want people to care about the sound of bullets coming close gunfire has to be deadly enough that you're actually worried about a bullet hitting your exposed dome. I don't know how you've broken directional sound in BF3, but I can hear where suppressed shooters are shooting from, regular guns are no issue. And that's the point of the "sound spot" - to give silencers a more powerful ability. As far as cone of fire...I've always found it to suck. I'd prefer a deviation that stays constant and quasi-random bumping. DoD:S did with some COF expansion. Whatever they do, it looks stupid when bullets come out of a barrel at odd angles.
__________________
All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others. Last edited by Rbstr; 2012-05-22 at 07:26 PM. |
|||
|
2012-05-22, 07:34 PM | [Ignore Me] #73 | ||
Colonel
|
I disagree, sound is suppressive, especially if they are more intense the closer they are to you.
With that said, if that IS why they have audio spotting it's bad; audio spotting is an extreme casualization. People don't even have to spot enemies in that case. Creating that casualization just to give value to suppressors is wrong. Audio spotting should have not been created and suppressors would be just to cut the sound. And, I'm actually talking about snipers. BF2 it was quite easy to tell sniper shot direction. It's not so in BF3. |
||
|
2012-05-22, 07:37 PM | [Ignore Me] #74 | ||
Captain
|
I personally really like the system from MAG. You get a white bar up on your reticule like direction of damage but it's for when an enemy is firing.
Also it comes up yellow if those bullets are coming towards you. |
||
|
2012-05-22, 08:24 PM | [Ignore Me] #75 | |||
Major
|
I have shot continuously at people before, but they still come out of cover while i am shooting and kill me, because they moved 1 metre away from my bullets and had no negative effect from me firing at him. I want a system that makes suppressing possible, i would like your way if it worked, but from what i have experienced, even in BF3, i am suppressing a target and he can still shoot me or doesn't react like he should. So if people reacted properly to the situation then i wouldn't want to add weird effects, but since they don't, we have to force them to react by giving them bad effects. |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|