There's an element to PS2's "simplification" that isn't about attracting casuals - PlanetSide Universe
PSU Social Facebook Twitter Twitter YouTube Steam TwitchTV
PlanetSide Universe
PSU: This quote will deconstruct in five seconds.
Home Forum Chat Wiki Social AGN PS2 Stats
Notices
Go Back   PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

Reply
Click here to go to the first VIP post in this thread.  
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 2012-06-08, 05:02 PM   [Ignore Me] #1
WorldOfForms
Corporal
 
There's an element to PS2's "simplification" that isn't about attracting casuals


I was thinking about the fewer vehicles and fewer continents, and having recently entered game development myself, it hit me: it's because the game is free to play.

Even aside from PS1's subscription, the game itself cost $50. What this meant was that the development cost of all those features at launch got immediately recouped with the initial purchase. Then there was the guaranteed revenue of subscriptions.

If PS2 tried to have ten continents and all those vehicles, the initial cost would be too risky for a game that generates zero revenue from the outset.

Also, because of the F2P model, the devs MUST provide lots of customization options, which takes dev time that could have been spent on those continents and vehicles we want so much. So it's also a shifting of dev resources.

Finally, they need more space to grow than PS1, content-wise. PS1 could sprinkle in new features just enough to keep people subbed, but PS2 will need to keep a steady stream of new stuff for people to buy. By starting with a small set of features, that gives the devs room to learn from the players: what are people buying, what classes/vehicle/continents do they play with the most? Then they can use that data to determine how to add new features.

Bottom line: PS2 may seem simple right now, but if the model works, it's possible the game will become much more complex than PS1, given some time.
WorldOfForms is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-08, 05:05 PM   [Ignore Me] #2
JPalmer
Master Sergeant
 
JPalmer's Avatar
 
Re: There's an element to PS2's "simplification" that isn't about attracting casuals


It has fewer conts. because launching with ten would be absurd. And every time they add a new one they can do a whole ad campaign to get more people in or get people who get bored to come back.

It has fewer vehicles because some were just begging to be combined.
JPalmer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-08, 05:05 PM   [Ignore Me] #3
Nash
Private
 
Nash's Avatar
 
Re: There's an element to PS2's "simplification" that isn't about attracting casuals


Err,... duh. :P
Nash is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-08, 05:05 PM   [Ignore Me] #4
Dreamcast
Major
 
Re: There's an element to PS2's "simplification" that isn't about attracting casuals


Makes Perfect sense.


Seems like they want to do money fast too since Planetside is suppose to launch this year.



Also one of the ways League of Legends makes money is by selling new champs.....So New weapons/Vehicles are going to be a good way to make money.

Last edited by Dreamcast; 2012-06-08 at 05:07 PM.
Dreamcast is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-08, 05:06 PM   [Ignore Me] #5
DerFurst
Corporal
 
DerFurst's Avatar
 
Misc Info
Re: There's an element to PS2's "simplification" that isn't about attracting casuals


Even more the reason for us to support this game. I don't think any of us will have a problem doing that.
DerFurst is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-08, 05:07 PM   [Ignore Me] #6
Mastachief
Contributor
Major
 
Mastachief's Avatar
 
Re: There's an element to PS2's "simplification" that isn't about attracting casuals


yes
__________________
Average play time of 2.8hours per day and falling.
Average play time of 2.5hours per day and falling. Need metagame.

Average play time of 2.0hours per day and falling. Need metagame / Continents.
Mastachief is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-08, 05:10 PM   [Ignore Me] #7
Xyntech
Brigadier General
 
Xyntech's Avatar
 
Re: There's an element to PS2's "simplification" that isn't about attracting casuals


I'd also mention that it's a sequel, not a remake.

Some of these changes are straight up simplification. Good or bad, some things are being made more simple.

However I believe that other things aren't being made more simple, just different. We can't yet see the complexity because we haven't gotten our hands on the game yet. The only legitimate comparison we have to a game of this style is the first Planetside, so obviously any changes are going to be a big unknown for us.

I would urge people to temper their fears and doubts with the understanding that with so many changes, we don't really know how good or bad some things will work. Thins aren't being changed in a vacuum. It's not like this is the first Planetside + regenerating shields on everyone. It's a whole new game, like a new ecosystem, where all of the different elements work together in a new way.

The developers have had more hands on time to make sure this stuff works together. At the same time, they have stated that they are waiting for data to roll in from beta to perfect the balance and add/remove some features.

I would suggest that players maintain the same outlook as the devs. Wait for data from the beta before freaking out.

At the same time, don't stop discussing and debating and speculating and throwing ideas out there. Some things we may not know, but other things may be more certainly or likely or obviously broken. Also, some things may not be broken, but we as fans just prefer it a certain way, and we need to let the developers know through our frequent discussions that it's important to us. They will probably be able to oblige is in a lot of areas, even if it's only a compromise.
Xyntech is offline  
Reply With Quote
This is the last VIP post in this thread.   Old 2012-06-08, 05:11 PM   [Ignore Me] #8
Malorn
Contributor
PlanetSide 2
Game Designer
 
Re: There's an element to PS2's "simplification" that isn't about attracting casuals


Simplification is good. That makes it easier to learn the more complicated parts, like capture mechanics, territory control, and resources.

And some stuff really needed simplifying. PS1 had a steep learning curve and that impacted new player retention in a bad way.
__________________
Malorn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-08, 05:12 PM   [Ignore Me] #9
Bags
Lieutenant General
 
Bags's Avatar
 
Re: There's an element to PS2's "simplification" that isn't about attracting casuals


PS1 didn't launch with all the vehicles it has now.
__________________
Bags is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-08, 05:32 PM   [Ignore Me] #10
NapalmEnima
Contributor
AGN Field Reporter
 
NapalmEnima's Avatar
 
Re: There's an element to PS2's "simplification" that isn't about attracting casuals


Originally Posted by WorldOfForms View Post
I was thinking about the fewer vehicles and fewer continents, and having recently entered game development myself, it hit me: it's because the game is free to play.
Congratulations on the career change. I made that switch from business programming myself last November. Still grinning. My face hurts.

It's not just free to play. The level of detail an AAA title needs in order to be competitive is VASTLY higher than it once was, such that even with spiffy modern tools (z-brush springs to mind) it still takes more time to generate the content.


Originally Posted by Bags View Post
PS1 didn't launch with all the vehicles it has now.
Nor features, weapons, caves, BFRs. For good or ill, Less Stuff.
__________________
NapalmEnima is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-08, 05:48 PM   [Ignore Me] #11
bjorntju1
Captain
 
bjorntju1's Avatar
 
Re: There's an element to PS2's "simplification" that isn't about attracting casuals


Don't forget everything is much more detailed. So it takes much more work to make something than 9 years ago. Just look at a continent in PS2 that we have now, and a continent in PS1 that we had 9 years back.
bjorntju1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-08, 05:51 PM   [Ignore Me] #12
WorldOfForms
Corporal
 
Re: There's an element to PS2's "simplification" that isn't about attracting casuals


Originally Posted by Bags View Post
PS1 didn't launch with all the vehicles it has now.
Yes, I remember, but the number on launch was bigger than what we have now:

PS2

Liberator
MBTs
Heavy Air Cav
Sunderer
Galaxy
Lightning
Quad

PS1
Reaver
Mosquito
MBTs
Sundy
Gal
Buggies
Deliverers
Lightning
Quads
ANT
AMS
Did I miss something?

I know that part of the reduced number is reducing redundancy, but clearly another element is less dev time modeling and designing separate assets.
WorldOfForms is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-08, 05:52 PM   [Ignore Me] #13
Aurmanite
Captain
 
Aurmanite's Avatar
 
Re: There's an element to PS2's "simplification" that isn't about attracting casuals


Almost every system in Planetside is deeper and more complex than the original.

"Simplified" and "dumbed down" are catch phrases/buzz words for people that want to seem like they have a valuable opinion.
Aurmanite is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-08, 06:11 PM   [Ignore Me] #14
Bobby Shaftoe
Staff Sergeant
 
Re: There's an element to PS2's "simplification" that isn't about attracting casuals


Originally Posted by Aurmanite View Post
Almost every system in Planetside is deeper and more complex than the original.
Having 'certs' to swap seats faster isn't my idea of 'useful' deepness nor complexity.

Does it even count if you can eventually get it all anyway? Inb4 'hurr BR40', yes, something that was added at the very end of PS1 life, not implemented from the start.
Bobby Shaftoe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-08, 06:13 PM   [Ignore Me] #15
Inverness
Private
 
Inverness's Avatar
 
Re: There's an element to PS2's "simplification" that isn't about attracting casuals


Originally Posted by Aurmanite View Post
Almost every system in Planetside is deeper and more complex than the original.
I won't say that yet until we know about how many different ways there are to capture bases and how many different tactics are available for that, because I haven't seen a generator or NTU silo yet.
Inverness is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply
  PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

Bookmarks

Discord

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 PM.

Content © 2002-2013, PlanetSide-Universe.com, All rights reserved.
PlanetSide and the SOE logo are registered trademarks of Sony Online Entertainment Inc. © 2004 Sony Online Entertainment Inc. All rights reserved.
All other trademarks or tradenames are properties of their respective owners.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.