Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Like going 90 down an icey road.
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2003-04-15, 11:23 PM | [Ignore Me] #16 | |||
|
||||
|
2003-04-15, 11:35 PM | [Ignore Me] #17 | ||
Corporal
|
Hmmm, it is a turret that is fixed on a tank so I wouldn't think recoil would be too big of a problem. Then again, I could be wrong. It's good to hear that the rail gun looks cool, heh. It should be like the rail gun from Red Faction... oh wait getting sniped by a tank on the other side of a wall would not be very fun.
__________________
|
||
|
2003-04-16, 12:08 AM | [Ignore Me] #21 | |||
Major
|
Also, you don't modify reality significantly in the interests of making things fair. There are ways to balance a tank aside from making it suffer recoil issues that it otherwise wouldn't, and most players can pick up instantly on anything nonsensical that happens to be working against them.
__________________
-Seer Last edited by Seer; 2003-04-16 at 12:10 AM. |
|||
|
2003-04-16, 12:21 AM | [Ignore Me] #22 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
How much faster are Mag Rider than say, a Prowler? Because since empire-specific tanks don't fit in Galaxies, that speed is a huge advantage, regardless of strafing. What good is a tank if you can't get it to the fight before it's over? Or am I exaggerating unknowlingly?
|
||
|
2003-04-16, 01:00 AM | [Ignore Me] #24 | ||
Major
|
I see your point, but how can an Abrams fire that fast? It is loaded manually. Maybe it's a record.
The Abrams' maximum rate of fire is about six rounds per minute; if a single M1A2 were to engage a half dozen enemy tanks... http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/l...s/4lastmbt.pdf
__________________
-Seer Last edited by Seer; 2003-04-16 at 01:14 AM. |
||
|
2003-04-16, 01:46 AM | [Ignore Me] #25 | |||
However, don't let this fool you. Tanks are fast, but they're not agile. Rough terrain slows them down considerably, and they can't weave between trees like a Basilisk can. And finally, travelling in a Prowler can be time consuming, especially on really rough continents (Ishundar has a lot of mountains and valleys, and makes for very poor tank travel). I personally would really like if Galaxies could hold a tank, but the tank couldn't bail while in mid flight, to prevent tank-drops. |
||||
|
2003-04-16, 02:14 AM | [Ignore Me] #27 | |||
Oh, but rest assured that Reavers are still good. They can chew MAXs and infantry up pretty well, and they're good against other vehicles and aircraft too. Last edited by Warborn; 2003-04-16 at 02:19 AM. |
||||
|
2003-04-16, 11:42 AM | [Ignore Me] #29 | |||
Private
|
I think Seer best put the roll of tanks versus infantry: they should inspire fear and caution in the footsoldiers. I'd really like to see outfits automatically require one man to hold an anti-tank role out of anticipation of seeing a behemoth like the prowler rolling down towards their position. |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|