Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: We're not too old for this sh!t!!!
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
2012-12-05, 10:04 AM | [Ignore Me] #1 | ||
Depends on what sort of cores it has. Which is why "3ghz dual core" is a poor pick for a performance requirement.
And old 3ghz Pentium D will get trounced by a 2.4ghz 1st gen i5. A 3ghz Sandy Bridge i3 is likely going to do better than an 2.5ghz Deneb Quadcore Phenom. For those with 32bit OS still...you're gonna have a bad time. Upgrade already.
__________________
All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others. Last edited by Rbstr; 2012-12-05 at 10:12 AM. |
|||
|
2012-12-05, 01:56 PM | [Ignore Me] #2 | ||
Very true. Updated OP to make that distinction clearer.
__________________
Doctors kill people one at a time. Engineers do it in batches. Interior Crocodile Aviator IronFist After Dark |
|||
|
2012-12-05, 07:18 PM | [Ignore Me] #4 | ||
Private
|
Hey there, Ailos!
I've just build a mid-range computer and have yet to upgrade my graphics card. As for the processor: I've got an [email protected] (4.0 won't be a stretch even using the stock cooler, it seems. Perhaps I got lucky with the batch. Perhaps I got lucky with the AS-5 application). As for the RAM: I've got 16GB of DDR3 1600. As for the graphics card... I am using an Nvidia GeForce 9600GT from many years ago. I plan to purchase a GTX 660Ti early next year after the price drops a bit. Will this swap allow me to play the game with some eye candy and a decent framerate? I've also got a CPU cooler upgrade scheduled... would hitting 4.3 or 4.4GHz be a good target? Thanks! Edit: I guess I should mention that with all settings on low and 75% (?) render I get 30-40FPS during calmer moments and 10-25 during chaos. As you probably know, GPU is the limiting factor 100% of the time at this point. -Inflectious Last edited by inflectious; 2012-12-05 at 07:25 PM. |
||
|
2012-12-05, 10:57 PM | [Ignore Me] #5 | |||
__________________
Doctors kill people one at a time. Engineers do it in batches. Interior Crocodile Aviator IronFist After Dark Last edited by Ailos; 2012-12-05 at 10:59 PM. |
||||
|
2012-12-10, 10:37 AM | [Ignore Me] #6 | ||
Private
|
This works ok In your Planetside 2 folder look for UserOpions open it and look for "RenderDistance=1000" change it to =1000 it helps alot.
went from 30-40fps to 50-70 in a fight Driving & Flying was 40-70fps now 70-110fps SOE says its OK Donefore |
||
|
2012-12-11, 12:46 PM | [Ignore Me] #7 | ||
Private
|
Ok, I need some advice on a small upgrade, and whether you guys think it will make a significant difference. Basically, whenever there are small groups, or at the warp gate, I get between 30-40 fps, and the game indicates it is GPU limited. I'm fine with that. However, when we get into big battles, the framerate slows right down to just over 10 fps, which is much to slow to be effective. The game indicates that CPU is the bottleneck. I have played with the performance monitor open on the other screen, and it consistently shows the CPU at between 40-60% used, evenly spread across the 4 cores. However, the RAM is almost completely used.
My question is, would increasing the RAM (I only have 4 GB now and a 32 bit system) improve the frame rate performance, or would it be a waste of time and money? Also, I know a better CPU and better GPU would be great, but budget is extremely limited at the moment. |
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
Tags |
guide, low fps, performance, ps2 optimization |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|