It feels like they kidding us..

SyrokX · 2013-01-20, 03:44 AM

Good morning everyone..
first, my english isnt the best, but i hope u all understand the message...

This is not a thread to cry about the game, its more a question i ask my self..
a fact that i need to accept...but it sucks...

Maybe someone could see that fact too?

in every communityforum u can read, "oh my god, the dev team play at the VS"
in every video u can see the VS is play'd..

but ok, we all know this...

what i wanna say here is,
i play ps2 since the Final Relaese on the EU-Ceres server, most time my platoon is on Indar.
dont remember who sayd "lets start with the TR", i would knock him -.- .. but ok, it is so..
we wont change to VS or NC..theres to much money in our chars.. and .. the TR isnt so bad!
only the others have to be balanced...

sorry guys..now, what i really wanna say,
on friday it was the 8!!!! time since i played PS2 the Vanus was holding just 15% of Indar and the NC about 25%..looks like the TR got chance to get the controll about indar .. for the first time! on ceres, no one got the controll about indar since release!..
so the interessting thing, and my question...
WHAT IS THE FU**ING REASON THAT THE SERVER GET DOWN EVERYTIME WHEN THE VANUS AER LOOSING ??????
8 ! fu**ing times, the only 8 chances for the TR to get Indar and the server get down..not for a few .. for all! and instant online again..

ok..u think...........shure..................ok......... .....
looking to get fast back online and go to the south to hold the line...but its hopeless... 20 mins later, the line is the same as everytime... Quartzridgecamp--tiallyos--zurvanamp--nsmaterial ....

honestly, at the 8.time u dont think its a accident...

So, flame me...

NewSith · 2013-01-20, 04:21 AM

...And Miller NC are always overrun by VS and TR on Indar, they rarely have any base, except Tawrich, that is getting constantly contested still...

From my perspective - NC are undepowered and TR holding more than half of the territory are obviously OP. Touche

Phantomdestiny · 2013-01-20, 04:50 AM

TR owns every single continent on miller right now . so i disagree OP

Sturmhardt · 2013-01-20, 05:44 AM

TR is not really allowed to cry op on anything if you ask me. Vs and tr weaponry are both a little op if you ask me... Buy as nc my view is biased.

.sent via phone.

ringring · 2013-01-20, 06:53 AM

Originally Posted by Sturmhardt

TR is not really allowed to cry op on anything if you ask me. Vs and tr weaponry are both a little op if you ask me... Buy as nc my view is biased.

.sent via phone.

OP is relative.....

As TR I think VS is a little OP and NC a little UP.

This is based on the the make up of the leaderboards and my subjective assessment of the territory owned.

However, apart from saying that VS get the best tank again I couldn't identify a weapon to clearly OP in itself (No, my NC friends, not even the Carv).

Baneblade · 2013-01-21, 07:32 AM

I dunno, my k/d on my TR and VS alts both are higher than my NC main... *shrug*

Gatekeeper · 2013-01-21, 08:13 AM

Based on my experience playing as VS on Cobalt, the TR are always the biggest threat and give us the toughest time, whereas we definitely seem to have a little less trouble from the NC and they win continents noticeably less often.

I see a lot more Mosquitoes flying than Reavers, and they seem more effective. Not sure about the balance of Prowlers versus Vanguards, but man those Prowlers move fast and that does seem to get them out of trouble pretty well - whereas I'm a lot less sure what the advantage of the Vanny is supposed to be.

Also the high fire-rate on TR weapons makes flinching a real problem against them, whereas the NC fire even slower than we do.

The one area where the NC have an apparent advantage is probably AI MAXs - I see a lot more SplatterMAXs than Heavy Cyclers or Quasars.

ShadetheDruid · 2013-01-21, 08:18 AM

Originally Posted by Gatekeeper

whereas I'm a lot less sure what the advantage of the Vanny is supposed to be.

They take less damage from the front (I believe it's 75% damage, compared to the 90% of the other two).

StumpyTheOzzie · 2013-01-22, 05:20 PM

Originally Posted by Baneblade

I dunno, my k/d on my TR and VS alts both are higher than my NC main... *shrug*

When I'm footing it and not liberating people....

^ & Score/min, certs/hour, weapon accuracy (you can see it as a hit% per weapon. NC is mid-high 20s, TR is low 30s, VS is high 30s depending on the weapon) resources/hour. Pretty much everything.

Mox · 2013-01-20, 05:47 AM

I think there was once a thread about a exploit which can be used to crash the server. I dont know if it is still possible.

Phantomdestiny · 2013-01-20, 05:52 AM

Originally Posted by Mox

I think there was once a thread about a exploit which can be used to crash the server. I dont know if it is still possible.

they fixed it

SeraphC · 2013-01-20, 07:22 AM

It's not just your English that's bad. It's your writing in general.

Originally Posted by SyrokX

for the first time! on ceres, no one got the controll about indar since release!

This is false. TR owned Indar about a month ago when I first started playing. It got reset either due to some downtime or due to a half asses cap attempt by another faction. I don't know.

It's not just the TR who lack organisation on Ceres. You have the same problem with every faction. No major, organized outfits, no leadership at a faction level. Very little smaller outfits stepping up and doing something meaningful.

Tatwi · 2013-01-20, 11:46 AM

Originally Posted by SeraphC

It's not just your English that's bad. It's your writing in general.

This is false. TR owned Indar about a month ago(missing comma) when I first started playing. It got reset either due to some downtime or due to a half asses cap attempt by another faction. (That was a very poorly structured sentence) I don't know.

It's not just the TR who lack organisation on Ceres. You (should have been a comma, not a new sentence. Also using the personal "you" instead of the proper "one") have the same problem with every faction. No major, organized outfits, (should have been "and") no leadership at a faction level. Very little (should have been "few", as little does not fit this context) smaller outfits stepping up and doing something meaningful.

Next time you think about slamming someone else for their use of the English language, perhaps you should consider your own imperfect mastery of it. English is not the native language for all people in the world, nor is it mastered by most who claim it as their native tongue, both of which are perfectly fine; Stop being an Internet snob.

NewSith · 2013-01-20, 11:52 AM

Originally Posted by Tatwi

Next time you think about slamming someone else for their use of the English language, perhaps you should consider your own imperfect mastery of it. English is not the native language for all people in the world, nor is it mastered by most who claim it as their native tongue, both of which are perfectly fine; Stop being an Internet snob.

Man, where have you been on saturday, when I nearly managed to fail my English grammar exam

ShadetheDruid · 2013-01-20, 01:44 PM

Originally Posted by Tatwi

English is not the native language for all people in the world, nor is it mastered by most who claim it as their native tongue, both of which are perfectly fine; Stop being an Internet snob.

..organisation..

Are you also aware that American English isn't the native dialect for everyone in the world? If you're going to call someone out for being a snob, that's a silly mistake to make.