Will This Run on Integrated Graphics? - Page 6

Rbstr · 2012-07-29, 10:43 PM

On HD space: Modern games take a fair bit of space...BF3 is over 20gb.
PS2 has huge levels, it will surely hit 10 in release form.

Originally Posted by IDukeNukeml

Your onboard set will work just fine on low settings most likely but it really depends on the engine and the build.

I really doubt that.

OnexBigxHebrew · 2012-07-29, 10:48 PM

Originally Posted by Rbstr

I really doubt that.

I agree.

Reaction · 2012-07-29, 10:48 PM

Originally Posted by Rbstr

On HD space: Modern games take a fair bit of space...BF3 is over 20gb.
PS2 has huge levels, it will surely hit 10 in release form.

I really doubt that.

i don't doubt it all depends on your setup, CPU and Mobo. As that video shows BF3 is a very demanding game/engine and it ran decent for top sgt.

Forgelight engine will not be even close to as demanding as the frostbite engine was.

We all know onboard graphics is not the way to go.. but the OP stated it was "until" he got his new card. It will likely be fine until his new card can be purchased.

Arcsilver · 2012-07-30, 11:03 AM

Just got email from smedley. My question was could i run PS2 on an i7-3610QM 6gb ram and gt 640m.

His response: "Should be good"

Woohoo!

Eyeklops · 2012-07-30, 11:11 AM

Originally Posted by Reaction

Forgelight engine will not be even close to as demanding as the frostbite engine was.

Why? Are shades of brown & tan harder to render than scenes with color in them?

Reaction · 2012-07-30, 11:16 AM

Originally Posted by Eyeklops

Why? Are shades of brown & tan harder to render than scenes with color in them?

because destruction elements are much more demanding on a game engine than one with much less. Also one engine is designed for free to play market (so even lower level PC's can run it) while the other is an expensive game where many people with monster rigs still to this day cannot get it to run properly and the game is almost a year old.

Eyeklops · 2012-07-30, 11:38 AM

Originally Posted by Reaction

because destruction elements are much more demanding on a game engine than one with much less. Also one engine is designed for free to play market (so even lower level PC's can run it) while the other is an expensive game where many people with monster rigs still to this day cannot get it to run properly and the game is almost a year old.

I could say that Forgelight is more demanding than Frostbite because it has to track and display 100+ more people on a 10x bigger map. How do you really know which is more demanding? Destruction, or tracking abnormal amounts of avatars? Your speculating. Also, just because PS2 is F2P doesn't have any bearing on how "demanding" the game engine is.