Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: death is a guy with no pants, his name is Hamma
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
|
2012-06-16, 03:05 AM | [Ignore Me] #2 | ||
Private
|
I'm leaning toward NC because they seem to offer the greatest challenge of the factions. Sure their weapons hit the hardest, but that's only if you are able to hit anything in the first place. I was kinda hoping that this would make them a less popular choice for more casual players, but I can see how they might have a wider appeal in terms of back story and aesthetics. The real irony is that purple and teal are my two favorite colors.
|
||
|
2012-06-16, 03:20 AM | [Ignore Me] #3 | |||
Second Lieutenant
|
But no, the NC is not the hardest faction to play. I can't speak for PS2 now, obviously. But in PS1 they were probably the easiest faction to play. ;P Gauss Rifle... hard hitting and it was impossible to miss with. Jackhammer... 'nuff said. Vanguard... indestructable beast. Sparrow... bye bye air cav. Haha okay, whine over. They do have some pretty awesome stuff though... so do the TR and VS, of course. But no, I wouldn't say they offer the most challange tbh. At least they don't offer any more of a challage than any other faction. In the end I think they all were pretty balanced, the only thing that made one faction "harder" to play was due to faction population.
__________________
|
|||
|
2012-06-16, 05:55 AM | [Ignore Me] #4 | ||||
Private
|
|
||||
|
2012-06-16, 10:58 AM | [Ignore Me] #13 | ||
Corporal
|
Lol, small dedicated left? They are more like a bunch of posivists, that tends to the right.
But like someone said, the lore gives a lot freedom. Theres some people that think the NC are the americans. I think their ranks are full of union workers fighting for a better future, something like anarchism. Theres a lot of people a think the TR are facists, I think they are more of a "communist" republic. And, theres a lot of people that think the Vanu are some mad men, while I think they are a bunch of Technocratic dudes that want more the power than the knowledge. Last edited by archaonn; 2012-06-16 at 11:03 AM. |
||
|
2012-06-16, 11:00 AM | [Ignore Me] #14 | |||
Corporal
|
|
|||
|
2012-06-16, 01:58 PM | [Ignore Me] #15 | |||
Private
|
Granted, i might be biased because i'm NC, but not American, and in no way see the NC goals (which i consider aligned with my own morals), as particularly american, or asian or european, etc. :P In my opinion, it all depends on whether you ask someone who's a member of the empire, or someone who's opposed to it, what their views are - as any proper lore should be set up. Ask a TR about the TR, and they're the peacekeepers, and have been for centuries. Ask anyone else, and they're soldiers blindly following a few power-hungry leaders, a corrupted version of the government they take their name from. Ask a NC about the NC, and they're fighting for the people, those that are denied their rights. Ask anyone else, and they're terrorists, fighting for egotistical reasons alone. Ask the VS about the VS, and they're fighting for the betterment of the human race, a utopia. Ask anyone else, and they're fanatics, putting all of their faith and hopes in prophecy. And in the end, unless there is a huge difference in population, i don't think it'll have an impact on which empire actually feels more of an underdog, except for the psychological aspect of it. Granted, the most populated empire will be able to have fronts on more continents, and will be more likely to have groups of skilled players, but with ~666 - 1000 slots for players per empire, the general distribution will be more or less the same. Again, the only difference being - to some extent - psychological. Edit: Oh, and general population statistics are not always representative of performance. There was a web-based challenge a month or two ago involving the upcoming "The Secret World" MMO. The team that were the most populated, fared worse than the remaining 2, and really it shifted greatly who had the upper hand. So "underdog" status can't be assumed based on population counts alone, but i reckon the word has become synonymous with population - not performance. Last edited by Santiak; 2012-06-16 at 02:05 PM. |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|