Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: [Sorry The Quote Box Is Full]
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
2012-07-27, 04:58 PM | [Ignore Me] #17 | ||
Sergeant Major
|
here you go OP I just made this video for you.. BF3 on low settings I unplugged my 6950 gpu and just used hdmi using only the onboard graphics from my I5 2500K cpu.
Also recorded using fraps. i would not recommend it.. but it will likely be possible as I said.. PS2 will not be as demanding as BF3 was. |
||
|
2012-07-27, 04:59 PM | [Ignore Me] #18 | ||
Sergeant
|
Even if it runs it would run very,very bad.
Tell you what,if you do get invited into beta be sure to PM me your account so atleast you wont feel bad that no one is playing on it PS:To top sgt video:It still looks better than COD Last edited by maddoggg; 2012-07-27 at 05:02 PM. |
||
|
2012-07-27, 05:06 PM | [Ignore Me] #19 | |||
Sergeant Major
|
|
|||
|
2012-07-27, 05:13 PM | [Ignore Me] #21 | ||
Sergeant
|
The ever-useful graphics card hierarchy chart http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...ew,3107-7.html tells all. Though the HD 2500 is not listed, it is almost on par with (a tiny bit better than, actually) the HD 3000 chipset. This is almost 3 Tiers below the 8800 GT, which was previously stated as a card that "would not be fun" to play on. However, at 1280x720 or 1024x1024 and on Low, it is likely going to be playable. The strong CPU performance from the i5 3450 is going to help, as the CPU will not be bottlenecked.
For additional reference, Crysis Warhead on low settings at 1366x768 achieved almost 40 fps on the HD 2500, although in BF3 it only achieved 20 FPS at the same resolution. So if 20 fps on low at a low resolution is playable for you, then I'd say go for it, but as a reference, an el-cheapo 7750 would give VASTLY better performance. Food for thought. Benchmarks for HD 2500: http://www.anandtech.com/show/5871/i...phics-tested/3 |
||
|
2012-07-27, 05:23 PM | [Ignore Me] #22 | |||
Major
|
|
|||
|
2012-07-27, 06:24 PM | [Ignore Me] #24 | |||
Private
|
Looks like half of you didn't read the whole post. If you didn't stfu. I said I'm getting a graphics card soon...
assholes.
I guess if the file size isn't over 10gb I'll try it. Why are you so stupid? I just fucking said that I have a i5-3450, which is probably faster or the same speed as your processor in games. |
|||
|
2012-07-27, 08:54 PM | [Ignore Me] #25 | |||
First Sergeant
|
But I've never used integrated graphics. My ( oh so professional ) estimate is low, maybe some settings a little higher than low. But again, I can't say for sure. What kind of new card are you getting? I just recently got a 550Ti. Looks really nice and preforms well. |
|||
|
2012-07-27, 09:23 PM | [Ignore Me] #27 | ||
First Sergeant
|
I gotta say sorry for the behavior of some of the people on this forum patflute. You came in here asking a question and got gang raped by a bunch of leet assholes. Don't let that keep you out of the forum. Most people on PSU are very cool. Don't let a few bad apples ruin your PSU experience.
Also,when you do get a better graphics card,go NC. |
||
|
2012-07-27, 10:05 PM | [Ignore Me] #29 | |||||
Private
|
|
|||||
|
2012-07-27, 10:13 PM | [Ignore Me] #30 | |||
Corporal
|
lmao, post of the week! From what I have heard the dev's talk about and what not using core duo's I would say you may be able to run it on low settings. I think even really good machines will struggle if a lot of people get in one little area. Intergrated's biggest concern I have found in the past usually deals with pixel shader versions. Last edited by soulsurfsublime; 2012-07-27 at 10:19 PM. |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|