New Rocketlauncher - Annihilator? - Page 3

Infernalis · 2012-12-19, 12:44 PM

Can't say I'm a fan of a myriad of weapons with little differences between them.

MrBloodworth · 2012-12-19, 12:51 PM

With a TTK this short, what real variance could there be? Other than situational utility,.

Infernalis · 2012-12-19, 12:56 PM

The TTK is short but there's worse, but I was for a slight increase in TTK in the first place anyway. As for weapons you can still add some game mechanics like overheating, charging, etc. Even in art design they all look the same.

Whiteagle · 2012-12-19, 01:13 PM

Well I'll probably get it, since I want to shoot both Magriders AND Scythes...

Don't need it for the DVS though, they have about one good pilot for every ten RAWKETPAWnoob...

MrBloodworth · 2012-12-19, 02:06 PM

Now, its no longer in the patch notes.

I do not know whats going on at SOE, but they seem to be creating lots of frustration with this sort of thing, and patch notes being different depending on what hour you look at them, and the patch notes not matching what was patched. SEE: Dumbfire or not dumfire for the orginal launchers.

They really need to get their shit together before no one wants to even bother anymore. 13 years of online game experience, you would think they would have patches and announcements down by now.

AThreatToYou · 2012-12-19, 02:48 PM

We need Lancer, Phoenix (perhaps modified), and Striker. Not some 'Annihilator' madness. More empire specificity.

Hamma · 2012-12-19, 02:51 PM

Has anyone logged in to confirm it exists or doesn't exist?

MrBloodworth · 2012-12-19, 02:59 PM

Originally Posted by Hamma

Has anyone logged in to confirm it exists or doesn't exist?

While I understand your question. We should not need to, and this is the confusion I speak too.

There are all ready eleventybillion threads about it.

Rago · 2012-12-19, 03:13 PM

Originally Posted by Hamma

Dunno, just seems redundant.

Yes

Indeed ^^

Sturmhardt · 2012-12-19, 03:14 PM

Seems like they scapped it. Oh man, SOE, what are you doing? Get your shit together....

Conq · 2012-12-19, 03:42 PM

I look forward to this going in the game soon, they should have had it in place from the get go. It's time this became an infantry based game with vehicles and not a vehicle based game with infantry.

This is a step in the right direction.

ChipMHazard · 2012-12-19, 03:53 PM

I'm finding this whole ordeal so very, very confusing.

I'm also wondering what their next missile launcher will be like, lock-on against infantry only? I know they made some pretty lofty promisses regarding the amount of weapons they plan on adding in, but still

maradine · 2012-12-19, 04:44 PM

Originally Posted by ChipMHazard

I'm also wondering what their next missile launcher will be like, lock-on against infantry only?

Absurd. Let's do it! Give to infils only for good measure.

Beerbeer · 2012-12-19, 06:46 PM

They should swap out the default launcher for this IMO.

Beerbeer · 2012-12-19, 06:52 PM

Btw, it's not redundant. Have any of you actually tried running around as infantry for an extended period of time? Die to an esf, respawn equip an AA rocket, run out and around the bend only to face tanks.

It's like trying to dodge land mines. No matter what choose, you feel like you got caught with your pants down.

That's why. It's not redundant.