Nanite Systems

CrystalViolet · 2011-09-27, 05:56 PM

Was trying to figure out how these guys play into the equation of PS2 and came up with this theory.

Nanite Systems represent a new category of vehicle that spawns at bases and doesn't require a cert to operate. Essentially, this would work in the same way as vehicles from the battlefield series, and allow players to assume roles as needed without having to recert their characters. NS vehicles would therefore likely be significantly less powerful than certable vehicles, but still come in handy in a pinch. This makes perfect sense given their lack of color, and the devs taking elements from faster paced shooters.

Any other theories?

Raymac · 2011-09-27, 06:13 PM

I call President.

FIREk · 2011-09-27, 06:20 PM

They're common-pool not common.

There will be no recerting in PS2.

With luck there will be some subtle differences (beyond color) between factions.

End. :P

CrystalViolet · 2011-09-27, 06:34 PM

The fact that T-Ray went to the trouble of laying out a grayish color pallet makes me think these will be disposable and on site for everyone to use. It solves the issue of getting stuck without a ride, and might be part of the reason why there will be no vehicle hacking in PS2.

NCLynx · 2011-09-27, 06:37 PM

Originally Posted by CViolet

The fact that T-Ray went to the trouble of laying out a grayish color pallet makes me think these will be disposable and on site for everyone to use. It solves the issue of getting stuck without a ride, and might be part of the reason why there will be no vehicle hacking in PS2.

The fact that he laid out a color pallet simply means these people are not aligned with any one faction.

FIREk · 2011-09-27, 06:44 PM

Originally Posted by CViolet

The fact that T-Ray went to the trouble of laying out a grayish color pallet makes me think these will be disposable and on site for everyone to use. It solves the issue of getting stuck without a ride, and might be part of the reason why there will be no vehicle hacking in PS2.

I think it's logical to assume that the NS color palette is for:
1) elements of the environment (the crates we saw in the trailer, and possibly other stuff like base equipment),
2) common-pool weapons; coincidentally, PS1's Punisher matched this color scheme.

I don't think there would be common-pool vehicles lying around... Not too PlanetSidey.

CrystalViolet · 2011-09-27, 06:53 PM

Originally Posted by FIREk

I think it's logical to assume that the NS color palette is for:
1) elements of the environment (the crates we saw in the trailer, and possibly other stuff like base equipment),
2) common-pool weapons; coincidentally, PS1's Punisher matched this color scheme.

I don't think there would be common-pool vehicles lying around... Not too PlanetSidey.

Good points, but why the need for a completely new story element/faction if that's all there is to it? Doesn't add up to me.

NCLynx · 2011-09-27, 07:00 PM

Originally Posted by CViolet

Good points, but why the need for a completely new story element/faction if that's all there is to it? Doesn't add up to me.

Thousands of people, actually speaking realistically or even undershooting it lets say there 300vs300vs300. Do you really think vehicles are just going to keep popping up for the people who don't have them?

You won't see vehicles just lying around unless someone has abandoned it.

Raymac · 2011-09-27, 07:02 PM

Originally Posted by CViolet

Good points, but why the need for a completely new story element/faction if that's all there is to it? Doesn't add up to me.

Could be as simple as filling in a blank. The color pallette for the factions all have a background on the what and why. So this just fills that in for the common pool. I mean along with the punisher, the deci also matches that same color scheme.

Also, nobody is calling to be Vice President of Nanite Systems? (Simpson's Trouble with Trillions episode? anyone? anyone? bueller?)

SgtMAD · 2011-09-27, 08:10 PM

Look, I have been trying to play nice and not tear into ppl but this thread reeks of stupidity

the speculation is getting out of hand,we are entering into the crazy bible code crap you see on Discovery

Rbstr · 2011-09-27, 08:27 PM

Originally Posted by Raymac

Also, nobody is calling to be Vice President of Nanite Systems? (Simpson's Trouble with Trillions episode? anyone? anyone? bueller?)

I call Chief of Product Development.

CrystalViolet · 2011-09-27, 06:44 PM

Correct, but story typically follows function in games like this which is why I'm speculating their purpose in the game.

DOUBLEXBAUGH · 2011-09-28, 06:58 AM

So none of you have been in a neutral base in PS1?

atone · 2011-09-28, 10:23 AM

My best guess is NS is just a name given to common pool from planetside 1, as basti said.
Probably more important for background story or possibly setting up future events.

Canaris · 2011-09-28, 10:29 AM

It's just a weapons manufacturer, we have them in RL too, they supply the bang bangs