| Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register |
PSU Social
|
 |
| Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2004-09-09, 09:01 PM
|
[Ignore Me] #1 | ||
|
Major
|
Ok. I need a new processor to replace my current AMD Athlon XP 1600+. I saw the 2600+, and was impressed. But then I saw the 2700+ at a higher price. The 2700+ has a higher clock speed, but the 2600+ has a bigger cache. Any thoughts? Which would be faster?
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
2004-09-09, 09:42 PM
|
[Ignore Me] #2 | ||
|
2600 is a barton, bartons = better imo, the t'breds had some big heat issues to. You can Oc that sucker alot to
__________________
 All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others. |
|||
|
|
|
|
2004-09-09, 10:57 PM
|
[Ignore Me] #4 | ||
|
Contributor General
|
Look for mobile XP 2600s. They overclock much better than any standard XP out there, bar none.
__________________
Commanding Officer  To the next idiot who says the PS2 Devs do not listen: See this Thread |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
